The Nobel Prize-winning Writer from Iceland

Halldór Laxness writings

Halldór Laxness (1902-1998) stands as a luminary amongst the other Icelandic writers of the 20th century. He  was a prolific author during his long career, writing 13 major novels, five plays and a dramatisation of one of his novels, not to mention his collections of short stories, essays and memoirs. His books have been translated into 43 languages and published in more than 500 editions. His career was unique, the diversity of his works almost without parallel and, with every book, he can be said to have approached his readers from a new and unexpected direction.

Halldór Laxness and Auður Sveinsdóttir Laxness


Halldór Laxness (1902-1998)

The Writings of a Master
In the 1920’s, he wrote a modernist novel with a surrealist overlay, ‘The Great Weaver from Kashmir’ (1927), as well as progressive poetry, while in the 1930’s, he wrote social realist novels, including ‘Independent People’ (1934-35) about Bjartur, the farmer of Summerhouses, “the story of a man who sowed his enemy’s field all his life, day and night. Such is the story of the most independent man in the country”, as it says in the book. In the 1940’s, he embarked on historical novels, including ‘Iceland’s Bell’, his contribution to Iceland’s campaign for independence, which was published 1943-6. Among other well known works by Laxness are ‘World Light’ (1937-40), ‘The Atom Station’ (1948), ‘The Fish Can Sing’ (1957) and ‘Paradise Reclaimed’ (1960). Laxness wrote absurdist plays in the 1960’s and, 40 years after ‘The Great Weaver from Kashmir’ and, at nearly 70 years old, he began to flirt anew with the modernist in novel, along with a new generation of Icelandic novelists, in ‘Under the Glacier’ (1968).

Halldór Laxness museum


Ideals and Beliefs
Laxness’ ideals and beliefs changed with time, as reflected to a certain extent in his works. He began his writing career as a Catholic, then turned to socialism, but later lost interest in all dogma—except perhaps Taoism. He never attempted to disown the earlier views which he subsequently repudiated, regarding them instead as an instructive part of his psychological development. Yet, from the earliest period to the latest, it is possible to detect the same basic themes in his books. He looked at things differently from other people, his writings were often barbed, and yet he always managed to see the comic aspects of his characters and their actions. His sympathy was invariably with the underdog. –SS